Why is it sometimes better to talk to someone who is not part of the problem?

Having a conversation with someone who is not part of the problem can be advantageous because they offer a fresh perspective. This outside view can help in identifying aspects of the situation that may not be readily apparent to those directly involved. People who are not emotionally invested in the issue can provide unbiased insights and may suggest alternative solutions that hadn't been considered. They can also help you brainstorm ideas and approaches without the burden of personal stakes affecting their judgment.

The other options do not align with the benefits of seeking an external opinion. The notion that someone will try to fix everything implies a lack of respect for the individual's ability to work through their own issues, which is not typically the goal of supportive dialogue. Creating more tension is counterproductive, as the aim is to alleviate stress, not amplify it. Lastly, an interest in well-being is crucial; a supportive listener should always have a genuine concern for the person's struggle, making those options less relevant to the benefits of consulting an outsider.